Good women who want to be good teammates to their men should be loyal, trustworthy, dependable, responsible, easygoing and easy to get along with. They should communicate in a mature, adult and calm, loving manner, taking the time to understand their men and the differences in how men and women communicate. They should understand that men think logically and want to make them happy, and they should, therefore, strive to speak in logical terms and give specific instructions on what they need to feel loved, supported, nurtured, safe and comfortable, instead of expecting men to understand without explanation or for them to draw the correct conclusions from examples and stories. Women should also understand that men are visual creatures and also like to be enchanted and seduced by their women who love themselves enough to eat healthy, exercise properly and look feminine, attractive and desirable. It takes two to make a relationship work. Men are not psychic. Women should bring joy, ease and delight into their men’s life without creating unnecessary drama.” ~ Coach Corey Wayne
Identity
Black Book Basics
Perhaps the most entertaining relationship advice, and sound advice at that. LJ
On attachment styles, a lucid exposition.
Hell
Why we go cold on our partners
Attachment theory
Attachment theory – Wikipedia
— Read on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attachment_theory
How to win…
How to be a Confident Man | Save Marriage on the Brink of Divorce
Want to finally understand what women need from you to be able to relax and surrender into being more open, more connected and more sexual with you?
— Read on goodguys2greatmen.co.uk/
“Women can smell, at the molecular level, an insecure, needy man, who is trying to make himself feel better.” How true those words are, even to-day!
The impact of lockdown
The impact of lockdown has been more destructive, in my view, than that of the contagion it has sought to deflect, for it is a measure that has corroded the seams sustaining relationships, as well as removing the social outlets that ordinarily permit people to live both with and without each other in elegant and untroubled equipoise. Its prolongation has also been an error, insofar as it allows the notion to prevail that the mere avoidance of illness can constitute a valid vital purpose in itself, which, were it true, would entail a collective reflexive flight from risk and a spiritless retreat from the dangers of nature. LJ
